Member-only story

On the Socratic perspective that there is no freedom in hatred

A lament on JD Vance’s foolery this week

Heroes in the Seaweed
4 min readFeb 17, 2025

We’re seeing this week JD Vance trying to lecture older societies, with actual historical experiences of fascism, about freedom. He’s rehashing the line that to police hate speech is to promote unfreedom. It is indeed, he says with the projection that characterises everything MAGA, “Orwellian”.

Thankfully, wiser people have pushed back, and explained to JD that things are not so simple. Let’s leave politicians to their politics here, hoping that the defenders of democracy can defeat the new barbarians of the 21st century, armed with their social media platforms. Things don’t look good right now, it has to be said.

Instead, let’s ask here about what model of freedom underlines JD’s sophism here.

In a word or words, JDs idea is what philosophers have called negative liberty. This is the idea that freedom is freedom from. Freedom from what? From any restrictions whatever. I am free when no one or nothing restricts me, at all in any way. I can say and do what I please.

It’s the model that the 1960s brought the cultural Left, as it turned away from its historical commitments to justice and solidarity into libertarianism. It’s the model that is also accepted by the neoliberal economistic Right. Here, freedom is the ability to truck and trade, with no concern for anything beyond your own self-interest, and shareholder value.

Create an account to read the full story.

The author made this story available to Medium members only.
If you’re new to Medium, create a new account to read this story on us.

Or, continue in mobile web

Already have an account? Sign in

Heroes in the Seaweed
Heroes in the Seaweed

Written by Heroes in the Seaweed

"There are heroes in the seaweed", L. Cohen (vale). Several name, people, etc. changes later, the blog of Aus. philosopher-social theorist Matt Sharpe.

Responses (2)

Write a response

The main problem with negative freedom is that I've never met anyone who holds it and applies it as a consistent principle. It always seems to simply mean my privilege and that of my group to do whatever I or we please, even if or especially if it…

I am not so sure about the jump from negative freedom to Nihilism, but I get the overall message of this article. The disconnect between the individual and their obligation to society has been a recurring theme in modern politics. It feels like the…