Living in hope? No thanks?
Francis Bacon’s Stoicism in “Of Earthly Hopes”
Shouldn’t we live in hope? Doesn’t hope that things will get better console us in hard times — it’s just a matter of waiting a little longer? Hold on, as REM sang? In the ancient world, the Stoics nevertheless warned against hope as a life strategy, or seeming virtue. Likewise, some versions of the ancient Pandora’s Box story suggest that hope was one of the evils of human life.
In the renaissance, British philosopher Francis Bacon tackled the subject in his meditation “On Earthly Hopes”. Without mentioning Stoic sources, and with his usual acuity, Bacon puts the philosophical case against living in hope — as against trying to actively do what you can to make the world better — as well as any other source we’re aware of.
Faith, charity and … imagination?
Hope is a theological virtue in the Christian tradition. Bacon therefore did well to specify that his criticism of the psychological or wider value of hope was a criticism only of “earthly hopes”: that is, dreams of more wealth, power, fame, an easier life, etc..
“On Earthly Hopes” takes as its object the biblical verse, from Ecclesiastes 6: 9:
Better is the sight of the eye, than the apprehension of the mind.