Is it really “all or nothing”? Well, maybe sometimes …

“Give me absolute control/over every living soul/and lie beside me, baby/that’s an order,” Leonard Cohen, The Future

There is a certain turn of mind, I’m sure you’ve met it, which suggests that “all or nothing” stances are the only truthful, authentic, or even courageous way to go.

It might be in politics, where it leads to the kinds of brinkmanship that risk utter catastrophe, unless we get the other team to back down. It might be in our personal life, when the same absolutism characterises how we treat those dearest to us.

Many of us seem inescapably drawn to those who present themselves as ‘strong men’, who advertise their unwillingness to compromise, as if this were the foundation stone of virtue itself. Very well.

I remember being on an email list once, where people were discussing an ancient philosophy, and could it be revived today? Soon enough, purists were emerging, producing lists of 8 or 10 things everyone who would lay claim to the school’s name would have to abide by. Otherwise, they were insufficiently vigilant, insufficiently strong, insufficiently pure, or just insufficiently informed.

I left the list, as I’m sure many others did. It’s our way, or the highway. I hit the road, preferring more open horizons.

There is a kind of purity about all or nothing stances, I get it. We know where we stand, or…